News and Insights
Articles 19 results
2.13.24
Jimmy Azadian, Chantel Febus, and Mark Magyar each authored their own respective articles for the 2024 Winter Edition of the American Bar Association's (ABA) Appellate Issues publication. The 2024…
1.05.23
James Azadian authored the article, "2023: New Year, New Laws," in Orange County Lawyer Magazine. In the article, Azadian discussed some of the more consequential or interesting laws that took effect…
10.01.22
Jimmy Azadian Authors Orange County Lawyer Article on Commercial Speech and Billboard Regulation
Jimmy Azadian authored the Orange County Lawyer article, "A Sign of the Times: Commercial Speech Under Fire." In the article, Azadian examines City of Austin v. Reagan Nat'l Advert. of Austin, LLC, in…
Blog Posts 53 results
7.01.25
Decision Alert: Retirees Cannot Bring a Claim Under the ADA as a “Qualified Individual”
In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Court held 7-2 that a retiree is not a “qualified individual” under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as the statute applies only to…
7.01.25
In Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, the Supreme Court unanimously determined 8-0 that the D.C. Circuit failed to afford the Surface Transportation Board (STB) the…
7.01.25
Decision Alert: Supreme Court Dismisses Labcorp v. Davis as Improvidently Granted
On June 5, 2025, in an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court dismissed Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis as improvidently granted—despite having already granted certiorari and heard oral…
Dykema Litigation Institute Webinars 9 results
9.24.24
Join Dykema for our annual Dykema Litigation Institute (DLI) United States Supreme Court Review and Preview webinar.
3.30.23
The Trial Lawyer's Secret Weapon: The Embedded Appellate Lawyer
Join our distinguished panel of Dykema's Trial Lawyers and Appellate Lawyers as they reveal how to stack the deck by effectively embedding appellate counsel in pre-trial and trial teams in this…
9.20.22
Dykema's Annual Supreme Court Review and Preview
Join members of Dykema’s national appellate practice team for a discussion of the key cases the Supreme Court decided in this momentous past term, and what to expect in its upcoming term.
Last Month at the Supreme Court Publications 17 results
7.03.25
Last Month at the Supreme Court | 2024 Term Conclusion: Part I
Decisions, decisions! Part I of the final edition of Last Month at the Supreme Court for the 2024 Term captures the outcomes of several critical cases. The Term, which has been described as one of the…
5.29.25
Last Month at the Supreme Court | May 2025
As Washington continues to buzz with activity, we are keen to report the latest developments in the May 2025 edition of Last Month at the Supreme Court. Learn about the Court’s evaluation of…
4.30.25
Last Month at the Supreme Court | April 2025
The March 2025 edition of Last Month at the Supreme Court spotlights a pivotal Supreme Court decision expanding the reach of the False Claims Act to E-Rate reimbursement requests—an outcome that…
Legal Alerts 93 results
7.29.24
In Murthy v. United States, the Supreme Court held that private and state plaintiffs did not have Article III standing to sue federal officials who plaintiffs claimed violated their First Amendment…
7.29.24
The Supreme Court dismissed the consolidated cases Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States without reaching the merits of whether the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act…
7.29.24
On June 28, 2024, the Supreme Court held in Fischer v. United States that, to prove a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), the government must establish a defendant impaired the availability or…
One Minute Matters Video Series 1 result
8.05.24
The demise of Chevron deference is expected to impact every industry subject to federal agency regulation, including climate, transportation, manufacturing, and healthcare. But it also presents a…
Press Mentions 17 results
3.28.25
“Justices’ TikTok Ruling Sets Stage For 1st Amendment Battle”
Chris Sakauye, Jimmy Azadian, and Chantel Febus authored the Law360 Expert Analysis article, “Justices’ TikTok Ruling Sets Stage For 1st Amendment Battle.”
6.28.24
“High Court Ruling Leaves Chance For Civil Forfeiture Reform”
James Azadian, Chantel Febus, and Joe Duffy co-authored the Law360 article, “High Court Ruling Leaves Chance For Civil Forfeiture Reform.”
6.13.24
“Textualism Still Dominates Justices' Arbitration Decisions”
Jimmy Azadian was quoted in the Law360 article, “Textualism Still Dominates Justices' Arbitration Decisions.”
Press Releases 37 results
6.05.25
Dykema Earns 18 Practice Area Rankings and 35 Individual Rankings in Chambers USA 2025
Dykema, a leading national law firm, announced today that it received 35 individual attorney rankings and 18 practice area rankings in the 2025 edition of Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for…
3.20.25
Four Dykema Attorneys Selected for 2025 Law360 Editorial Advisory Boards
Four Dykema attorneys were selected to serve on various Law360 Editorial Advisory Boards for 2025. According to Law360, the editorial advisory boards provide feedback on the outlet's coverage and…
2.20.25
Four Dykema Attorneys Listed as Southern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars for 2025
Dykema, a leading national law firm, announced today that three of its Los Angeles-based attorneys were named to the 2025 Super Lawyers list by Southern California Super Lawyers Magazine. One of the…
Speaking Engagements 2 results
8.07.17
Appellate Practice Do’s and Don’ts, OCBA Appellate Section Meeting
To view video of this presentation, click here.
Webinars 2 results
6.03.21
Join us for this educational webinar as members of our Appellate and Complex Motions Team share the recipe for Dykema’s “secret weapon” at trial, and learn ways appellate counsel help facilitate a win…
9.01.20
A Review of This Past Term at the Supreme Court, Pepperdine Caruso School of Law
Jimmy Azadian, Los Angeles-based member in Dykema’s Commercial Litigation Practice Group and the firm’s nationwide appellate practice, will present, “A Review of This Past Term at the Supreme Court,”…
